Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Flickr
Connect with us on LinkedIn

SPONSORS

Sell Photos Online

FEATURED SITES

PhotographyTips.com - the #1 guide to better conventional and digital photography Become a Member iPhone Posing GuideGuide to Posing the Female Model BookGuide to Posing the Model CD
Login

Photography Forums


Category:
customize
profile new topic join search today help
home
login
Author
Message Text For:
Thinking of giving up raw (for non essential stuff)
[ FORUMS : THREADS : REFRESH : NEXT THREAD ]

swanseamale472003
Date Posted: Jun/21/2014 3:26 AM
View Profile Print Thread Text Format
I've always shot raw format + large jpeg (for viewing quickly) but I'm fed up with buying new hard drives, raw fills them so quickly I'm struggling to keep on top of replacing the things (and buying 2 at a time for back up)
That coupled with the huge amounts of dvd's I'm getting through (another back up)means the average day out snapping some rock pools can mean 15 or 20 GB of space and 8 dvds gone.
I've reached a point where I'm seriously considering switching from raw for all non essential stuff. Yes I know the quality is better and it's 16 bit (well near enough) but for most of my own stuff I simply don't need it. An A0 camvas looks great just off the jpeg, and even 20x30 glossy prints look fine, and to be honest I don't print much for myself anyway.
I'll still use it for customer stuff or if the lighting is tricky and I might need to pull back highlights or shadows, but for a stroll around with the camera I think raw's days are numberd with me.

Any thoughts??

Reply
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous

Alice
Date Posted: Jun/28/2014 8:30 PM
Print Thread Text Format
I shoot almost everything in JPG now. Naturally, there's less leeway in post processing so I have to make sure the gray matter between my ears is working properly but, overall, it's worked well for me for sports. I still shoot RAW occasionally if the lighting conditions are very bad or if I'm shooting something I don't normally shoot.

Alice (formerly photolady)

Reply
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous

swanseamale472003
Date Posted: Jun/29/2014 5:01 AM
View Profile Print Thread Text Format
Thanks for the reply Alice, thats pretty much what I'm thinking, keep raw for the important or tricky suff.
Wayne

Reply
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous

swanseamale472003
Date Posted: Aug/21/2014 6:37 PM
View Profile Print Thread Text Format
Update.

Well I stopped using raw for the non work stuff and it's made life a lot easier space wise. Do I see any difference in the quality... No at the sizes I'm working for my own stuff theres no way to tell any difference.

I did a location scout recently and didn't bother taking a camera, (one of the other guys had his kit with him so I didn't bother) and would you believe it a great shot or six to be had at the end of the walk. I was a bit gutted I hadn't bothered with my camera then when I remembered I had my phone with it's camera. Wow camera phones have come a long way, ok I wouldn't want a 20x30 glossy off it, but at normal sizes or for the web I was quite impressed.
Heres one from it.

HDR 24 13.22.jpgHDR 24 13.22.jpg ( 108 Kbytes)
Reply
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous

Dimitri
Date Posted: Sep/10/2014 5:30 AM
View Profile Print Thread Text Format
Wayne
I do the same.
I shoot jpeg for almost 90% of my shots. I am a little more careful with the metering, but in general I have found that, with the improvement in sensor technology, there is no absolute need to go for raw, unless for specific requirements.

-------------------------
Athens, Greece

---------------
Too many Chiefs, not enough Indians....

Reply
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous
[ FORUMS : THREADS : REFRESH : NEXT THREAD ]

FuseTalk v2.1 - Copyright © 1999-2001 e-Zone Media Inc. All rights reserved.